Kenji Explains
14 min video
3 min read
The 3 Company Valuation Methods Explained
You just saved 11 min.
The big takeaway
Companies are valued using three main approaches: multiples-based (comparing to similar companies), discounted cash flow or DCF (projecting future cash flows), and cost approach (replacement cost). Each has strengths and weaknesses, so professionals use a 'football field' chart combining all three to derive a valuation range rather than a single number.
Why Value a Company
Business acquisition or sale
Companies are valued when considering buying or selling a business, department, or determining fair price in a transaction.
Investment decision-making
Individual investors value companies to determine if a stock is overpriced, underpriced, or fairly valued before buying shares.
Universal application across assets
The same three valuation methods apply beyond companies to real estate, software, departments, and other assets.
Method 1: Multiples-Based (Market) Approach
What is a multiple
A multiple is a ratio comparing one financial metric to another, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), enterprise value to sales, or enterprise value to EBITDA. It compares your company's worth relative to similar companies in the market.
Common multiples in finance
Key multiples include P/E ratio (price per share divided by earnings per share), enterprise value over sales, and EV/EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization).
1
Price-to-Earnings (P/E)
Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
2
Enterprise Value to Sales
Total company value ÷ Revenue
3
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise value ÷ Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization
Common valuation multiples used in finance
Steps to apply multiples approach
Find comparable companies in the same industry, geography, and size; gather their price per share and earnings per share; calculate each company's P/E ratio; take the average (or median) P/E; multiply your target company's earnings by this average multiple to get the valuation.
1
Identify 5+ comparable companies (same industry, geography, size)
2
Gather price per share and earnings per share for each
3
Calculate P/E ratio for each comparable company
4
Compute average (or median) P/E ratio across comparables
5
Multiply target company's earnings by average P/E multiple
6
Result is estimated share price or valuation
Multiples-based valuation process
P/E ratio example calculation
If five comparable companies have an average P/E ratio of 7.9, and your target company has earnings of 3 dollars, the valuation is 3 × 7.9 = 23.55 per share.
23.55
Estimated share price (3 dollars earnings × 7.9 average P/E)
Example multiples-based valuation
Limitations of multiples approach
P/E ratios don't work for unprofitable companies; average ratios can be skewed by outliers, making median preferable; finding truly comparable companies is difficult, especially for large or unique businesses.
Method 2: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Intrinsic valuation concept
DCF focuses on a company's internal operations and cash flows rather than external market comparisons. It values a company based on projections of how much money it will generate in the future.
Time value of money principle
A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future due to inflation and opportunity cost. Therefore, future cash flows must be discounted back to present value using a discount rate.
DCF calculation example
Project stable cash flows (e.g., 10 million per year for 5 years). Discount each year's cash flow using the formula: Cash Flow ÷ (1 + discount rate)^year. Sum all discounted cash flows to get present value. With a 5% discount rate, year 1 is 10M ÷ 1.05, year 2 is 11M ÷ 1.05², and so on.
23.29 million
DCF valuation (5-year cash flows discounted at 5%)
Example DCF valuation result
Terminal value necessity
After the projection period (e.g., 5 years), the company continues operating. Terminal value estimates the business value beyond the forecast period using either perpetual growth method or exit multiple method.
Discount rate and WACC
The discount rate reflects the company's cost of capital and risk. It is calculated using WACC (weighted average cost of capital), which accounts for both debt and equity financing costs.
Multiple scenario analysis
Professional DCF valuations typically include three scenarios: base case (expected performance), best case (optimistic with expansion), and worst case (pessimistic with setbacks). Each scenario produces a different valuation.
1
Best Case
Optimistic: strong growth, new markets
2
Base Case
Expected: normal business performance
3
Worst Case
Pessimistic: lawsuits, market downturns
DCF scenario analysis approach
Method 3: Cost (Replacement Cost) Approach
Replacement cost principle
A company's value equals the cost to replace it with an equivalent new one. If your factory burned down, the replacement cost is what you'd pay to rebuild it.
Cost approach formula
Valuation = Replacement Cost (construction, architect fees, etc.) minus Depreciation (wear and tear reducing value) plus Land Value. This approach works best for tangible assets like manufacturing plants, houses, or cell towers.
1
Calculate replacement cost (construction, labor, materials)
2
Subtract depreciation (wear and tear over time)
3
Add land value
4
Result is total asset value
Cost approach valuation formula
Best suited for tangible assets
The cost approach works well for physical, touchable assets where replacement costs are clear. It is less effective for intangible assets like software or algorithms, where replication costs are unclear or impossible to determine.
Challenges with cost approach
Historical construction costs may not reflect current market prices; regulatory changes can make replacement impossible (e.g., zoning restrictions preventing rebuilding); costs are difficult to account for precisely.
Pros and Cons Comparison
Multiples approach strengths and weaknesses
Strengths: intuitive, easy to understand, relatively quick to execute. Weaknesses: difficult to find truly comparable companies, especially for large or unique businesses; market conditions heavily influence results.
Pros
Intuitive, easy, fast
Cons
Hard to find comparables, market-dependent
Multiples-based approach trade-offs
DCF strengths and weaknesses
Strengths: independent of market conditions, focuses on intrinsic company value. Weaknesses: time-consuming and complex; heavily dependent on assumptions about future growth, making valuations prone to optimism or pessimism bias.
Pros
Market-independent, intrinsic focus
Cons
Time-consuming, assumption-heavy, complex
DCF approach trade-offs
Cost approach strengths and weaknesses
Strengths: straightforward and easy to understand. Weaknesses: costs are difficult to account for accurately; regulatory changes can make replacement impossible; less applicable to intangible assets.
Pros
Easy to understand
Cons
Costs hard to account for, regulatory risks
Cost approach trade-offs
The Football Field Valuation
Why combine all three methods
Since no single valuation method is perfect, professionals bundle all three approaches into a single visualization called a football field chart to derive a valuation range rather than a single number.
Football field chart structure
The chart displays valuation ranges from each of the three methods (multiples, DCF, cost) as horizontal bars. It also includes the company's 52-week high and low stock price range for market context.
Valuation as art and science
Valuation is regarded as both an art and a science because it requires technical analysis combined with judgment. Analysts use the football field to understand the range of possible values rather than seeking one precise number.
Worth quoting
"A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future."
— Kenji, at [5:53]
"Valuation is mainly regarded as both an art and a science."
— Kenji, at [12:54]
"None of the three methods are actually perfect."
— Kenji, at [12:54]
Made with Glimpse by Wozart
glimpse.wozart.com/v/k6zsw3qe
Share this infographic
Read this infographic as text

The 3 Company Valuation Methods Explained

Summary of the video “How to Value a Company | Best Valuation Methods by Kenji Explains.

Companies are valued using three main approaches: multiples-based (comparing to similar companies), discounted cash flow or DCF (projecting future cash flows), and cost approach (replacement cost). Each has strengths and weaknesses, so professionals use a 'football field' chart combining all three to derive a valuation range rather than a single number.

Why Value a Company

Business acquisition or sale

Companies are valued when considering buying or selling a business, department, or determining fair price in a transaction.

Investment decision-making

Individual investors value companies to determine if a stock is overpriced, underpriced, or fairly valued before buying shares.

Universal application across assets

The same three valuation methods apply beyond companies to real estate, software, departments, and other assets.

Method 1: Multiples-Based (Market) Approach

What is a multiple

A multiple is a ratio comparing one financial metric to another, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), enterprise value to sales, or enterprise value to EBITDA. It compares your company's worth relative to similar companies in the market.

Common multiples in finance

Key multiples include P/E ratio (price per share divided by earnings per share), enterprise value over sales, and EV/EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization).

Steps to apply multiples approach

Find comparable companies in the same industry, geography, and size; gather their price per share and earnings per share; calculate each company's P/E ratio; take the average (or median) P/E; multiply your target company's earnings by this average multiple to get the valuation.

P/E ratio example calculation

If five comparable companies have an average P/E ratio of 7.9, and your target company has earnings of 3 dollars, the valuation is 3 × 7.9 = 23.55 per share.

Limitations of multiples approach

P/E ratios don't work for unprofitable companies; average ratios can be skewed by outliers, making median preferable; finding truly comparable companies is difficult, especially for large or unique businesses.

Method 2: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)

Intrinsic valuation concept

DCF focuses on a company's internal operations and cash flows rather than external market comparisons. It values a company based on projections of how much money it will generate in the future.

Time value of money principle

A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future due to inflation and opportunity cost. Therefore, future cash flows must be discounted back to present value using a discount rate.

DCF calculation example

Project stable cash flows (e.g., 10 million per year for 5 years). Discount each year's cash flow using the formula: Cash Flow ÷ (1 + discount rate)^year. Sum all discounted cash flows to get present value. With a 5% discount rate, year 1 is 10M ÷ 1.05, year 2 is 11M ÷ 1.05², and so on.

Terminal value necessity

After the projection period (e.g., 5 years), the company continues operating. Terminal value estimates the business value beyond the forecast period using either perpetual growth method or exit multiple method.

Discount rate and WACC

The discount rate reflects the company's cost of capital and risk. It is calculated using WACC (weighted average cost of capital), which accounts for both debt and equity financing costs.

Multiple scenario analysis

Professional DCF valuations typically include three scenarios: base case (expected performance), best case (optimistic with expansion), and worst case (pessimistic with setbacks). Each scenario produces a different valuation.

Method 3: Cost (Replacement Cost) Approach

Replacement cost principle

A company's value equals the cost to replace it with an equivalent new one. If your factory burned down, the replacement cost is what you'd pay to rebuild it.

Cost approach formula

Valuation = Replacement Cost (construction, architect fees, etc.) minus Depreciation (wear and tear reducing value) plus Land Value. This approach works best for tangible assets like manufacturing plants, houses, or cell towers.

Best suited for tangible assets

The cost approach works well for physical, touchable assets where replacement costs are clear. It is less effective for intangible assets like software or algorithms, where replication costs are unclear or impossible to determine.

Challenges with cost approach

Historical construction costs may not reflect current market prices; regulatory changes can make replacement impossible (e.g., zoning restrictions preventing rebuilding); costs are difficult to account for precisely.

Pros and Cons Comparison

Multiples approach strengths and weaknesses

Strengths: intuitive, easy to understand, relatively quick to execute. Weaknesses: difficult to find truly comparable companies, especially for large or unique businesses; market conditions heavily influence results.

DCF strengths and weaknesses

Strengths: independent of market conditions, focuses on intrinsic company value. Weaknesses: time-consuming and complex; heavily dependent on assumptions about future growth, making valuations prone to optimism or pessimism bias.

Cost approach strengths and weaknesses

Strengths: straightforward and easy to understand. Weaknesses: costs are difficult to account for accurately; regulatory changes can make replacement impossible; less applicable to intangible assets.

The Football Field Valuation

Why combine all three methods

Since no single valuation method is perfect, professionals bundle all three approaches into a single visualization called a football field chart to derive a valuation range rather than a single number.

Football field chart structure

The chart displays valuation ranges from each of the three methods (multiples, DCF, cost) as horizontal bars. It also includes the company's 52-week high and low stock price range for market context.

Valuation as art and science

Valuation is regarded as both an art and a science because it requires technical analysis combined with judgment. Analysts use the football field to understand the range of possible values rather than seeking one precise number.

Notable quotes

A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future. — Kenji
Valuation is mainly regarded as both an art and a science. — Kenji
None of the three methods are actually perfect. — Kenji

More like this